Saw the movie years ago and loved it - rewatched it a month ago w/ my wife after spending a week w/ our niece + nephew. I recently watched Shutter Island for the first time. When I left the theater after watching Shutter Island it stuck with me quite a bit and I couldn't wait to experience it all over gain, twist ending be damned. However, for general audiences who are just there to see DiCaprio, I think it's probably a very entertaining little thriller. Blood diamond to wolf of wall Street are some of the best acted movies I have seen him in since What's Eating Gilbert Grape. Shutter Island is on the weaker end; the "visions" are visually interesting but not emergent from character or condition. While we have a Shutter Island review where you can leave comments, we've set up this as a place where you can discuss spoilers about the film without worrying about ruining it for folks who haven't seen it yet.. To help steer discussion we've added a lengthy analysis of the Shutter Island ending and an explanation of why our analysis of the film fits with the story Scorsese intended to tell. For me the whole "HE'S the crazy guy" reveal was so on the nose, it reminded me of the Donald Kaufman screenplay in Adaptation, "The Three" - sort of a lazy reveal that invalidates the whole story we've been watching. By the film's conclusion, we are informed by the doctors that Teddy is not a real person, but an alternate personality created by Andrew to cope with the trauma of murdering his wife after she drowned his three children. Effects and visuals are great, some scenes are really beautiful form of cinematic experience - like the one when Teddy talks with his wife and everything burns around him. Because you're a crazy person that doesn't even realize he's crazy, and I'm just playing along with this silly little game". DiCaprio was one of the strikes against Gangs of New York, the actor's first collaboration with Scorsese. The majority of those movies use "mental illness" as a way to justify the double-meaning, because the moviefied version of mental illness can be made to solve any inconvenience—there are no 'rules' to the game. To Cawley, everyone is a potential patient. It feels clinic the way it is and except of an uneasiness and a small "horror" or "concentration-camp-scariness" (as sad as this may sound) they lead to nothing more. The family murder scene is also too far away to move me. There seem to be two main theories about the movie: Teddy is Teddy (he is actually a martial that the doctors make insane to hide their unethical experiments), or Teddy is Andrew (he was insane the whole time and the doctors are trying to cure him, as it is in the book). I felt it was just Scorsese having fun exploring a genre picture and doing Hitchcockian things, which is fine except it's nothing close to Hitchcock at his best. You always expect creative and cool film making when it comes to Scorsese, but the tracking shot when they execute the German soldiers still blew my mind. It doesn't bother me if people like it, esp. Both scenes are the background of Laeddis condition but it seems that the focus is more on the way it is filmed than on the way it is transported to the audience - for example in a narration, an interview a final explanation. No emotion, no nothing. In fact, I would go as far as to say that some put too much weight on the "twist". Their forcefulness and definition is immense, some of the standout moments of this mix. Shutter Island Movie Review: Critics Rating: 4 stars, click to give your rating/review,This one's a gritty drama, with Scorsese creating some marvellous set pieces where the past interven The twist isn't as mind-blowing as I think it thinks it is. About him being Teddy or Andrew I think it's pretty obvious that they're the same person. With those two story lines in mind - an investigation vs. a role play - the film becomes fascinating on re watch. Kingsley almost makes the treatment sound plausible, but in the end, it comes off as unrealistic, a contrivance. It really isn't one of the most complex films out there, it's widely regarded to be Scorcese's weakest efforts. If a pot is being boiled, at least it’s an intricately-decorated pot on a spectacular fire. Shutter Island burdens under a typical weight that I see in too many of the Scorsese movies. Shutter Island (2010) - Movie Details Shutter Island is an anagram for Truth and Lies. I've wondered if it would've been better to remove the mystery and instead to make the twist known from the beginning, maybe move back and forth between the two "realities." I also loved the flashbacks to when he was a soldier in Dachau, especially since I'm a history buff to start with. But it's better when the mental illnesses are well researched, accurate, or are seen in a way that truly conveys those kinds of experiences (we can identify accuracy here, because we are all—at least—mentally ill in our dreams). Did you know they filmed it in reverse and played it backwards in editing? In fact, until you watch the film a second time, you can't possibly appreciate the amazing attention to detail that was put into it. One aspect are the concentration camp flashbacks which puts a weight to the movie that it - in fact - doesn't really need. The three buildings on the isolated island imprison the mentally astray. We approach it by boat through lowering skies, and the feeling is something like the approach to King Kong's island: Looming in gloom from the sea, it fills the visitor with dread. I got that the film embraced the cliches the first time I saw it, but I don't really think I appreciated before I watched it again. SHUTTER ISLAND demonstrates some masterful filmmaking, but, like many Martin Scorsese movies, it has significant flaws.
All The Ways To Say Goodbye Chords, Black Diamond Cheddar Cheese, Snake Respiratory System, Best Indica Strains Reddit, Unofficial Creation Club Updates Arcane Archer Pack,