Would you mind to compare the new Samyang 35 2.8 pancake with these vintage 35 (canon, Olympus, Minolta,zeiss distagon)? It is a much more exciting lens because it has exceptionally good bokeh, it isn’t any bigger but built more solid. Ich kann es nicht anders beschreiben. Michael. I have never used this expensive lens but some tests suggest that it isn’t any sharper. You really should review the breech mount FD lenses, particularly the concave 35/2, Your email address will not be published. Danke. Would other ‘bodies’ might indicate different quality than this one? Canon A1 35mm Film SLR camera with FD 50mm f1.8 in good condition Tested with example photos curretro. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Man spürt oder hört das meist gar nicht, denn es ist ja noch Fett da und außerdem sind da ja noch die verklebten Brösel der Gleitlager, sodass die Linsengruppe nicht wild rumklappern kann. P.S. Vielen Dank für alle Sorgfalt bei Euren Tests. Canon FD Lens Info . I bought it for 25€. + sharpness as good as the best crons Minolta MD Rokkor 2.8/35 – Both lenses are very simliar in size and performance. Für ein in meinen Augen schönes Bokeh kann ich nur das Rokkor 55/17 sehr empfehlen. Summicron-M V3 6-elements Canada black ($1200+) Manual lenses on the Sony a7 – a beginners guide, Announced: Voigtlander 35mm F2 Apo-Lanthar, Manual lenses on the Sony a7 - A beginners guide, Shootout: The Canon FD 35mm lenses - phillipreeve.net, Why manual lenses on the Sony a7 series are a smart choice (by Phillip Reeve) - sonyalpharumors sonyalpharumors, Beginners Guide to using Manual Lenses on the Sony a7 - phillipreeve.net, https://phillipreeve.net/blog/guide-adapters-minolta-mc-md-lenses/, Sony FE lenses: A comprehensive and independent guide, Guide to Macro Lenses for the Sony a7 series, Beginner’s Guide to Manual Lenses on the Sony a7, Guide to Adapters for Manual Lenses on the Sony a7 series, The Guide to Canon FD lenses on the Sony a7 series, The rated List of Minolta MD/MC Lenses on the Sony a7, Quick-Review: Minolta MC Rokkor 35mm 1:1.8, Number of Aperture Blades: 5 (slightly curved), User-Guide to wide-angle lenses for Sony a7 a7ii a7rii. Deshalb wenig genutzt. Eine Kleinigkeit, die auch in anderen Listen unscharf ist. Serial Number 10001-99999, and absolutely love it, use it most of the time on my camera as an all-around lens but lately been struggling getting shots in focus as my twin girls have become much faster (17 months old). A review of the Canon FD 35mm f2 for full frame, APS-C and super 16 sensor video as well as photography. At wide open significant purple fringing Leider habe ich mein repapriertes Exemplar des Objektivs mehr hier, sonst würde ich es dir zeigen. Otherwise I haven’t noticed any problems. The high weight could be an issue with the plastic bayonet A7/A7R but it didn’t impress the A7II. Initially, this lens was designed to be used with the old Canon FD mount Film cameras (such as F1 & AE1). Unfortunately, it is paired with a slight mustache style sub-frequency. Ich hatte kurz das Canon 35mm F2.0 LTM (Spitzname “Japanisches Summicron”) als Alternative an der A7R. The weather in Germany is pretty dull this winter, therefore the samples are not as nice as usual. Thank you again for the great tests and additional inspiration! I must say — Now, after using this cheap Canon nFD 35mm f2.8 (payed 60EUR) for several years, i’m still all the time impressed how sharp the images are. I was about to buy the 35mm 1.7 Ultron until I saw this review. While originally sold as a consumer SLR, it is more solid and far smoother than most DSLRs of any price today. (https://www.flickr.com/photos/nippoletano/14874546929) Wie finden Sie das? Mechanically, it is one step ahead of the other two 35mm lenses. The 2.8/35 TS feels very solid. Um das Ergebnis nachhaltig und stochastisch haltbar zu belegen, wären noch mehr Objektive nötig. Bokeh is good with smooth backgrounds and it does deteriorate only a little at longer distances. The nFD 2.8/35 shows the normal nFD-build quality. I love lens comparisation tests, but to test a Shift lens wide open doesn’t make sense to me. The corners show good resolution at f/2.8 but very low contrast, for very good results it makes sense to stop down to f/5.6 and they are best at f/8. Although I didn’t analyze every aspect of the lenses, the recommendation is already pretty easy and also a bit surprising. Ich denke aber dass ich mit zwei Exemplaren schon mehr verglichen habe als die meisten (oder alle) vor mir. Does this matter? Neither of them performs well. The FD 35mm f2 concave Thorium lens was an L lens before Canon invented them, mine is forty years old and it's such a good lens they'll have to prise it out of my cold dead hands. Grund: Die Helicoid-Schnecke “übersetzt” ja zwischen Fokusring und Linsengruppe. To double-check the results, I bought two samples of the 2.0/35 which showed virtually identical performance. I converted it by replacing the lens mount. Hallo Jannik, This lens will not fit on newer EF mount cameras. Thanks! Its strength is AF and small size, still it’s not bad. I’ll start that comparison with a closer look at the FD 35mm lens family because otherwise this can be a bit confusing.